FORUM

Page 9 of 13 Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13  Next

View previous topic View next topic Go down

How can fans find reasons to ignore this players attributes for the team they say they're pulling for?

Post  deusXango on Mon Jun 05, 2017 11:05 pm

Leading scorer for an NCAA champion.

ACC player of the year.

Consensus first-team All-America.

North Carolina swingman Justin Jackson doesn’t  need resumé filler before the June 22 NBA draft
Shocked
avatar
deusXango

Posts : 2739
Join date : 2011-12-21
Location : Oaxaca, Mexico

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: FORUM

Post  deusXango on Mon Jun 05, 2017 11:01 pm

BallinD wrote:
Oracle wrote:
@Ballin - I just don't get the Justin Jackson love, he reminds me of Stanley, a guy that you can't figure out his position in the NBA. Too weak to be a SF, to slow to be a SG spells a tweener that takes an ass whooping nightly, IMO. But I could be wrong, just ask Phillip who was all over Booker and I thought Stanley was the stuff!  He may be a tweener, but what happened to someone being a ball player.  By some definitions many great players have been and many current good and great players are tweeners:  Barkley, Worm, Draymond, KD, Lebron, Iguodala, Porzingis, Tobias, Iverson, McCollum, Antetetokoumpo, Crowder, to name a few.  So what!  a baller balls!  But true, he is a question mark, like all prospects, so I agree with that.  
Great rebuttal BallinD, and with examples to make your case, which very few others don't do. Jackson is a proven ball player on his level of competition and can be KCP's replacement in the starting unit, whereas the other popular prospects are destined to be role playing bench players.
BTW, I know you hate to read articles that don't support your thinking, but there was one recently that is of interest: Why the Detroit Pistons should pay Kentavious Caldwell-Pope, where they compare two players, read the article to see who the players are.

It would be great if KCP could have a development curve like Bradley Beal.  Last year was a regression, though, not an improvement for KCP, just a fact, we went over that already, but you keep stubbornly saying he improved.  But, here's hoping he can get back on track!
avatar
deusXango

Posts : 2739
Join date : 2011-12-21
Location : Oaxaca, Mexico

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: FORUM

Post  cool breeze on Mon Jun 05, 2017 9:56 pm

Oracle wrote:@Phillip - I really like Mitchell, 6'3 with a freaking 6'10 wingspan??? This dude is the perimeter defender we need! Imagine him, KCP and Stanley Johnson defending, points for the opposing team will become scarce. If Stanley can boost his scoring, we're looking at near Bad Boys level defense.

@DX - I hear you on Reggie, but, IMO, I think the main team deserves a chance to right the ship. That doesn't mean that we turn down any move for any of them, but if nothing presents itself, I want to see how things progress and make corrections at the Feb deadline. I'm not wedded to this position, but that's how I feel right now, a good argument could move me I'm keeping an open mind.

@Ballin - I just don't get the Justin Jackson love, he reminds me of Stanley, a guy that you can't figure out his position in the NBA. Too weak to be a SF, to slow to be a SG spells a tweener that takes an ass whooping nightly, IMO. But I could be wrong, just ask Phillip who was all over Booker and I thought Stanley was the stuff!

@Don - "What is it that we don't get Oracle. I am concerned about the team offering Pope a new contract for $20 to $25 million dollars for 4 or 5 years. If that deal is done and Pope doesn't improve next season we will be watching him do the same thing for 5 more years". 

Don, nobody can help you with your fears, you have a lot of them relating to this team. You demand that players be loyal and you're the first to run for the exits when you're supposed to be the one to show some. Either accept that this is all totally business or do unto others as you would have them do unto you.

As for your fear that KCP won't improve. This like most of what you've been ranting about lately had no basis in anything rational. You can say that about a lot of players, but KCP has improved every year! Irrational fear is a mother  lol. Amazingly you have no fear believing that guys who haven't even proven they can be NBA players and bench warmers are the next great thing without a shred of evidence... Wow!

BTW, I know you hate to read articles that don't support your thinking, but there was one recently that is of interest: Why the Detroit Pistons should pay Kentavious Caldwell-Pope, where they compare two players, read the article to see who the players are.

http://pistonpowered.com/2017/06/04/detroit-pistons-pay-kentavious-caldwell-pope/ wrote:I want to end this article with a comparison, to help demonstrate the improvements KCP has made, and to look ahead at what we can hope and expect from him next season.

Player A:

Year 1 per game averages: 31.2 minutes, 13.9 points, 41 percent field goal, 38.6 percent three-point, 3.8 rebounds, 2.4 assists, 1.6 turnovers, 0.9 steals

Year 4 per game averages: 31.1 minutes, 17.4 points, 44.9 percent field goal, 38.7 percent three-point, 3.4 rebounds, 2.9 assists, 2 turnovers, 1 steals

Player B:

Year 1 per game averages: 19.8 minutes, 5.9 points, 39.6 percent field goal, 31.9 percent three-point, 2 rebounds, 0.7 assists, 0.4 turnovers, 0.9 steals

Year 4 per game averages: 33.3 minutes, 13.8 points, 39.9 percent field goal, 35 percent three-point, 3.3 rebounds, 2.5 assists, 1.1 turnovers, 1.2 steals
I'm sure none of this will change you, I just hope you can stop being this guy(just a joke)  lol lol lol




I fear death but that is about it Oracle. But I am surprised as to how confident you are about KCP's ability to play right up there with the great players based on how he has played to this point. None of the stats you illustrated spoke of basketball aptitude or basketball IQ. You don't win with low basketball IQ players. He is one of them. He doesn't stand out at all on most nights on the hardwood. He is not a $12 million dollar player so why would the team pay him $20 plus million? Do you want to watch a basement dwelling team? Don't you want to watch players like those who played in the finals last night? Are you satisfied with the way Pope played last season as one of the key players on a horrible team? He was a key player on his college team that consistently lost. Is he a smart winning type player who has proved beyond a reasonable doubt that he is the man like Joe Dumars or Hamilton who will shine on the big stage? We who fear have too many questions. That makes some fans angry. I would rather have fear than be angry with others thoughts.

Our team is going nowhere if you haven't come to that realization yet something is wrong with the way you are watching this team play basketball. You act like an agent that has a vested interest in Pope. You rant that I would rather place my faith on untested players. The reason why that might be true for me is that I haven't determined if The Untested are keepers or not. Pope has played most of the minutes at the 2 guard since he arrived. I don't see any change in his game. He plays all of those minutes based on "coaches decision". He hasn't earned all that playing time. But watching him not earn the playing time say like Avery Johnson who has quickly become a key two way player for Boston, it is silly that you are so strong on KCP. While I might write something saying that I fear the short term future of the Pistons and that I fear Detroit will be doomed by signing another below average player to a contract that should be reserved for an elite player, you get angry like those folks who are out there hunting for potential doubters that our fearless leaders can solve the climate change issue. While I do fear that I will see another dull boring low basketball IQ type team again next season, would you please kick in some of your hard earned money and take on part of KCP's contract to free up some money for the Pistons? Can that be done. The supporters kick in some money on the side for their favorite players. That money is not charged against the CAP. Now remember this was KCP's big year. He put everything he had into that season. He might not be as motivated next season. I fear that of course which is very wrong as you pointed out. I also fear that PT Barnum's relatives who are now making a living in politics will swindle tax payers even more as they declare an even bigger war on climate change. They are ready for battle on the backs of those young couples who have small children and obey all the laws but can't get their kids braces because the braces must be sacrificed for the greater good of reducing CO2 gases .02% in 90 years as per the Paris accords. It that big treaty agreement as big as the surrender of of Germany in WW2? If only the believers would agree to pay more money for the cause they believe in so those families can keep more of their own money that they worked hard for. Common sense doesn't always win out. Middle class Americans have been paying for the great fight on the climate in 3rd world countries instead of buying a home or the kids braces. Are they pissed off about it? I know a lot of young parents who are pissed. They want to pay less taxes. So the hunters are out there trying to identify who those folks who want lower taxes. They need to be punished for doubting. I fear for them Oracle. Families are in big debt and struggling just like the Pistons will be after they sign Pope.

I can just turn off the Pistons like so many old loyal fans have already done long ago. I do not get excited about watching Drummond, Jackson and Pope. The Big Three must go! The Big Three must go! Time has expired for the low basketball IQ players. Management must move on and through trial and error get lucky and find some keepers. Those three players are not keepers. But I will say this Oracle. KCP is like several other players on the current roster who cannot find a groove because they are playing with inept point guards and the self designated captain Andre Drummond. I fear they will lose their minds unless management shows them some mercy and finds a trade for them.Pope has played hard. He should get a break and be able to leave this dysfunctional program. As this management team most likely will blow their chance of trading Drummond this summer, I suggest that SVG go out and land a like minded old pro who bamboozled Joe Dumars years ago. Yes Stan needs a power forward who can shoot the 3 ball. That is all he talks about. So why not give Charlie V another shot. Imagine what the defensive stats would look like. Some stat guy who works for the players agent could come up with something positive much like those stats you brought out about KCP. Jackson, Drummond and Charlie V together. Imagine how great that would be. Let's do it!

Based on the way this team played last season, no player on the current team is worth more than 6 million a year. Show me your game. Then you get paid. Stop the foolishness Stan Van Gundy. The franchise is ruined. Find a way to make it right. Move all the key starters who managed to get their butts kicked almost every game in the first and third quarters. The entire team needs to be turned over and we need a new coach and GM if that doesn't happen. I am waiting for the climate in Piston land to change for the better. How many dreadful years have we suffered though? I count last years playoff appearance as a dreadful season as well. The same players have just become a little worse yet of course we must worry about losing one so we have to pay whatever they demand. The true believers demand this. That is why management will sign Pope. They fear the fan backlash if Pope is not signed. They fear the fans might wonder why Pope got all of those minutes during the time when he was so ineffective you didn't notice he was on the court. The amount doesn't matter so don't talk about it or the fans might get angry. Is this what George Orwell wrote about?

cool breeze

Posts : 2544
Join date : 2011-12-21

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: FORUM

Post  BallinD on Mon Jun 05, 2017 7:07 pm

Oracle wrote:
@Ballin - I just don't get the Justin Jackson love, he reminds me of Stanley, a guy that you can't figure out his position in the NBA. Too weak to be a SF, to slow to be a SG spells a tweener that takes an ass whooping nightly, IMO. But I could be wrong, just ask Phillip who was all over Booker and I thought Stanley was the stuff!  He may be a tweener, but what happened to someone being a ball player.  By some definitions many great players have been and many current good and great players are tweeners:  Barkley, Worm, Draymond, KD, Lebron, Iguodala, Porzingis, Tobias, Iverson, McCollum, Antetetokoumpo, Crowder, to name a few.  So what!  a baller balls!  But true, he is a question mark, like all prospects, so I agree with that.  

BTW, I know you hate to read articles that don't support your thinking, but there was one recently that is of interest: Why the Detroit Pistons should pay Kentavious Caldwell-Pope, where they compare two players, read the article to see who the players are.

It would be great if KCP could have a development curve like Bradley Beal.  Last year was a regression, though, not an improvement for KCP, just a fact, we went over that already, but you keep stubbornly saying he improved.  But, here's hoping he can get back on track!
avatar
BallinD

Posts : 371
Join date : 2015-10-29
Location : Milky Way

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Stuff...

Post  Oracle on Mon Jun 05, 2017 3:04 pm

@Phillip - I really like Mitchell, 6'3 with a freaking 6'10 wingspan??? This dude is the perimeter defender we need! Imagine him, KCP and Stanley Johnson defending, points for the opposing team will become scarce. If Stanley can boost his scoring, we're looking at near Bad Boys level defense.

@DX - I hear you on Reggie, but, IMO, I think the main team deserves a chance to right the ship. That doesn't mean that we turn down any move for any of them, but if nothing presents itself, I want to see how things progress and make corrections at the Feb deadline. I'm not wedded to this position, but that's how I feel right now, a good argument could move me I'm keeping an open mind.

@Ballin - I just don't get the Justin Jackson love, he reminds me of Stanley, a guy that you can't figure out his position in the NBA. Too weak to be a SF, to slow to be a SG spells a tweener that takes an ass whooping nightly, IMO. But I could be wrong, just ask Phillip who was all over Booker and I thought Stanley was the stuff!

@Don - "What is it that we don't get Oracle. I am concerned about the team offering Pope a new contract for $20 to $25 million dollars for 4 or 5 years. If that deal is done and Pope doesn't improve next season we will be watching him do the same thing for 5 more years". 

Don, nobody can help you with your fears, you have a lot of them relating to this team. You demand that players be loyal and you're the first to run for the exits when you're supposed to be the one to show some. Either accept that this is all totally business or do unto others as you would have them do unto you.

As for your fear that KCP won't improve. This like most of what you've been ranting about lately had no basis in anything rational. You can say that about a lot of players, but KCP has improved every year! Irrational fear is a mother  lol. Amazingly you have no fear believing that guys who haven't even proven they can be NBA players and bench warmers are the next great thing without a shred of evidence... Wow!

BTW, I know you hate to read articles that don't support your thinking, but there was one recently that is of interest: Why the Detroit Pistons should pay Kentavious Caldwell-Pope, where they compare two players, read the article to see who the players are.

http://pistonpowered.com/2017/06/04/detroit-pistons-pay-kentavious-caldwell-pope/ wrote:I want to end this article with a comparison, to help demonstrate the improvements KCP has made, and to look ahead at what we can hope and expect from him next season.

Player A:

Year 1 per game averages: 31.2 minutes, 13.9 points, 41 percent field goal, 38.6 percent three-point, 3.8 rebounds, 2.4 assists, 1.6 turnovers, 0.9 steals

Year 4 per game averages: 31.1 minutes, 17.4 points, 44.9 percent field goal, 38.7 percent three-point, 3.4 rebounds, 2.9 assists, 2 turnovers, 1 steals

Player B:

Year 1 per game averages: 19.8 minutes, 5.9 points, 39.6 percent field goal, 31.9 percent three-point, 2 rebounds, 0.7 assists, 0.4 turnovers, 0.9 steals

Year 4 per game averages: 33.3 minutes, 13.8 points, 39.9 percent field goal, 35 percent three-point, 3.3 rebounds, 2.5 assists, 1.1 turnovers, 1.2 steals
I'm sure none of this will change you, I just hope you can stop being this guy(just a joke)  lol lol lol



avatar
Oracle

Posts : 6035
Join date : 2011-12-21

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: FORUM

Post  cool breeze on Mon Jun 05, 2017 11:31 am

deusXango wrote:Of all the starting PG's in the playoffs this year, from the injured to the MVP's, who can we say that Reggie Jackson is in the same class with?

How is it that playoff teams, with consistent middling draft picks, find room for their rookies to make considerable contributions and our rookies couldn't get past the D-League?

Sh!t is constantly talked about Drummonds lack of leadership, but what type of leadership has SVG and Reggie Jackson provided? Both are older and, one would assume, wiser!

Drummond has been marked as being lazy, but to talk about lazy, you've got to look at SVG...WTF is he doing talking about trading the 12th pick for a veteran (who has no future with the team and chances are, ain't worth sacrificing the pick for) if he's not too lazy to do his due diligence to make that pick count?

Beyond having the larger contract, can someone give a sensible explanation as to why Marcus Morris is the starting SF (at one time the majority of fans expected Morris to be relegated to the bench, in favor or of Jon Leuer starting at PF, when SVG started talking about a shakeup) instead of Tobias Harris?

Am I the only fan that remembers that during the first 21 games, when Ish was getting acclimated to the team, we never consistently got blown out in the first quarter, even when we lost?

Why is the slow developing pick & roll our staple play (every team employs this basic play, just not as ineffective) and the local media ignores the importance of ball movement and up-tempo play for a team that's constructed to thrive on that style of play?

Right here, right now, why is Reggie Jackson and Jon Leuer, valued more than Andre Drummond and KCP? A weak ass, out of gas PF and ball hogging, stumbling PG are necessary ingredients for our "win now" or future, when the Cavs and Warriors abdicate their thrones?

dX one big reason why Detroit's money play, the pick and roll, was not effective other than Reggie Jackson's ineffective play is the simple fact that opposing teams decided to shut down the potential for that point guard dribble drive and a center dunk. If that is all you got then why wouldn't opposing teams take that away. To think that everything was amiss just because of Reggie's health issues and that pick and roll play will work next season is pure folly. A team has to have more offensive weapons and even then that elementary play between Jackson and Drummond might work when they are playing at top form perhaps two times a game. And it will never happen in crunch time. To base the entire team structure on the Jackson-Drummond pick and roll play while the other 3 players stand at spots far away from the basket with no movement by those other players will get you where this team is today. BAD!

When some of us talk about basketball IQ and how important it is to know how to play fundamentally sound basketball all we want is a small taste of what we see from both teams that are playing in the finals. For example, last season I witnessed at least 65 times either Stanley Johnson or KCP being overplayed in their designated spot beyond the baseline 3 point line. When that happens point guard is supposed to be aware of where everyone is located on the court in the half court offense and he has to see how the defense is over playing Pope or Johnson. The other 3 players on the floor have to also know what the most plausible reaction should be and then clear out of the paint to allow Pope or Johnson to execute a back cut and receive a perfect pass from the point guard which should result in an easy layup. So did I ever see that play executed properly last year? Maybe two times a best did the guard react properly to being over played and make the fake and then get the baseline lane to the basket or if they did recognize the situation and got themselves wide open both of our point guards would be oblivious and keep right on dribbling around to get their own shot or pass the ball to the power forward who would then be forced to take a long low percentage contested shot at the end of the shot clock. That was just one play that both Cleveland and Golden State can do while sleep walking. You have to know how to react to situations and take advantage of whatever the defense gives you. If your basketball IQ and fundamentals are AWOL you will look like the boring Pistons. Last night Durant was being overplayed by James and made the perfect fake automatically without having to think and slipped down the baseline for an easy score that broke the game wide open.

Isiah Thomas at times will talk about the key to the NBA game for player success is to have the ability to instantly recognize situations and make the proper read on either offense of defense. He does this on NBA TV and will get on the court and show examples of the different situations and how the ball handler needs to think quickly and then do the right thing. Labron James has become one of the best play makers that I have ever seen. Zeke calls him a genus on the hardwood and I agree for that reason Labron James is the best player in NBA history. He not only sees everything but in the off season makes sure everyone one of his teammates are working hard to improve and James tells the players what they need to do for the team to succeed. Meanwhile, we have a team leader who says all his teammates need to do is rest. Would Andre Drummond be a different player if the Pistons had just one All Star leader type older vet? Drummond doesn't respond to any coach well. But a highly respected All Star player like Labron James would tell Andre the facts of live real quick and maybe that is what our big center needs. He needs a bully leader who will embarrass Andre to the point where he will be forced to put in the work he needs. I think this is what Drummond fears. If a highly respected NBA players called him out repeatedly hurting the team with his lack of interest and work ethic, life could be hell for him. That is why Andre Drummond decided to appoint himself as the team leader. Somehow Stan Van Gundy let it happen. Of course we have no All Star high basketball IQ player either. So don't expect anything new if this team comes back well rested next fall. If big moves are not made Stan Van Gundy will be fired at the end of next season or before.

cool breeze

Posts : 2544
Join date : 2011-12-21

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Just some questions and this ain't all of 'em!

Post  deusXango on Mon Jun 05, 2017 1:13 am

Of all the starting PG's in the playoffs this year, from the injured to the MVP's, who can we say that Reggie Jackson is in the same class with?

How is it that playoff teams, with consistent middling draft picks, find room for their rookies to make considerable contributions and our rookies couldn't get past the D-League?

Sh!t is constantly talked about Drummonds lack of leadership, but what type of leadership has SVG and Reggie Jackson provided? Both are older and, one would assume, wiser!

Drummond has been marked as being lazy, but to talk about lazy, you've got to look at SVG...WTF is he doing talking about trading the 12th pick for a veteran (who has no future with the team and chances are, ain't worth sacrificing the pick for) if he's not too lazy to do his due diligence to make that pick count?

Beyond having the larger contract, can someone give a sensible explanation as to why Marcus Morris is the starting SF (at one time the majority of fans expected Morris to be relegated to the bench, in favor or of Jon Leuer starting at PF, when SVG started talking about a shakeup) instead of Tobias Harris?

Am I the only fan that remembers that during the first 21 games, when Ish was getting acclimated to the team, we never consistently got blown out in the first quarter, even when we lost?

Why is the slow developing pick & roll our staple play (every team employs this basic play, just not as ineffective) and the local media ignores the importance of ball movement and up-tempo play for a team that's constructed to thrive on that style of play?

Right here, right now, why is Reggie Jackson and Jon Leuer, valued more than Andre Drummond and KCP? A weak ass, out of gas PF and ball hogging, stumbling PG are necessary ingredients for our "win now" or future, when the Cavs and Warriors abdicate their thrones?
avatar
deusXango

Posts : 2739
Join date : 2011-12-21
Location : Oaxaca, Mexico

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: FORUM

Post  cool breeze on Sun Jun 04, 2017 6:25 pm

deusXango wrote:If the trade of Drummond for Porzingis is consummated, will he play with a frontline of Harris and Ellenson? The bigger question is, how big is Porzingis contract compared to Drummond's max. deal and there's talk about us throwing in #12? That seems kind of backwards; why isn't N.Y. throwing us their 1st rounder? Hating Drummond, for whatever reason, is one thing, but being foolish when it comes to trading him is another.

Looking at New York's salary structure for 2017-18 Porzngis is only signed through this next season for $4.5 million and change. Sign and trade maybe? Would he want to play in Detroit? Lots of unknowns.

If not NY then what about the Celtics? I have thought all along that this is where Drummond would end up. What players would Stan take that would include the number on overall pick? I would love Avery Johnson and that would end the discussion regarding Pope. Johnson is a player on the rise and a solid two way player who did very well in the playoffs. . Too bad Brad Stevens could not be part of a Drummond deal with Boston. It would be interesting to see how Drummond would adapt to playing for a coach who makes players accountable and makes them conform to the designated role each player is given to make the team better. But is would be difficult to believe that Danny Ainge would take a chance on Drummond.

cool breeze

Posts : 2544
Join date : 2011-12-21

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Draft prospects I think got real NBA talent

Post  Phil1980boy on Sun Jun 04, 2017 2:28 am

First thing first. The Pistons need play makers. Guys who can make other people better and guys who. Can block shots and defend at A high level.
Also, Stan is burning me up with this trade the pick s.h.i.t. Everybody wants that already established vet. The hard job is drafting and developing a kid with true talent.

These are the guys that look solid so far. Jayson Tatum: Sky high IQ. Good size. Pure shooter. High character. Jonathan Isaac: great size. Play maker on defense. Hard worker, super athletic, loads of potential to be a star but it will take time. D.Smith Jr. Attacks the rim hard, very skilled, tuff kid.
I will come back with more guys later.
avatar
Phil1980boy

Posts : 801
Join date : 2012-01-05

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Rumblings? Rumblings or senseless gossip?

Post  deusXango on Sat Jun 03, 2017 10:16 pm

If the trade of Drummond for Porzingis is consummated, will he play with a frontline of Harris and Ellenson? The bigger question is, how big is Porzingis contract compared to Drummond's max. deal and there's talk about us throwing in #12? That seems kind of backwards; why isn't N.Y. throwing us their 1st rounder? Hating Drummond, for whatever reason, is one thing, but being foolish when it comes to trading him is another.
avatar
deusXango

Posts : 2739
Join date : 2011-12-21
Location : Oaxaca, Mexico

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Finally there is some rumblings about potential trades involving Andre Drummond

Post  cool breeze on Sat Jun 03, 2017 6:37 pm

Mr. P is unhappy in NY. He fits SVG's system. But isn't it interesting that Drummond's value is not good enough for an even trade. We have to throw in our 12th pick according to the experts. Still to me this is a positive thing for the Detroit Pistons. And the Boston Celtics might be interested in our starting center as well. This might be the best place from Drummond because if Brad Stevens is unable to make any headway in improving Andre nobody can. This is the time Piston fans to part with Andre Drummond. Maybe Baynes has been advised to wait and see what happens with the Drummond situation.

Reading some of the posts, I had to laugh at the idea that Detroit might get a deal done if they included our 2nd round pick from last year. I thought all the talk was that he was not going to be invited back to Piston training camp. Things are getting pretty wild to mention his name.

What I am getting is that Detroit might not be in a good bargaining position the talk involves our 12th pick.

cool breeze

Posts : 2544
Join date : 2011-12-21

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: FORUM

Post  deusXango on Sat Jun 03, 2017 5:57 pm

Why is it that Reggie Jackson and Jon Leuer receive absolutely no trade conversation? It's stupid to talk about going for a veteran, in exchange for our #12 pick, when we have Leuer, and dumber still, not knowing who's the best backcourt player on the Pistons; Reggie or KCP. IMHO Drummond is a more valuable frontcourt player than Leuer and KCP is a more valuable backcourt player than Reggie, so what's the confusion?

"Get them draft picks right. P.S. Stay away from Donovan Mitchell and Justin Jackson. They will be FLOPS in the NBA. I GUARANTEE IT!!!"-Phil1980boy

How does the leader of the NCAA Championship team transition into the NBA as a flop? Are there multiple examples of this? This player consistently improved his game year-after-year, something KCP hasn't done to the extent Jackson has, and I'm talking college and pros. Donovan Mitchell is an athletic freak, but too short for todays elite SG's...his basketball I.Q. isn't as high as Jackson's either. We're talking #12! If he should be available and we get him, it's my opinion that we scored a gem. Phillip Boy, your post blew me away, until that statement I highlighted; after we passed on your boy Devin Booker, I can see you pulling for Luke Kennard this year, but I'm taking the taller, more skilled player, with the higher ceiling.

When are we going to get a new coach? Okay, so no one likes Mark Jackson, then who? We can't keep placing our trust in SVG.
avatar
deusXango

Posts : 2739
Join date : 2011-12-21
Location : Oaxaca, Mexico

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Not So Fast

Post  lemonpen on Sat Jun 03, 2017 3:10 pm

Phil1980boy wrote:This organization can be A easy FIX.

I got 3 facts I stand by.

1. Reggie Jackson must go.
2. KCP must be involved in some kind of sign and trade if possible.
3. Let's take the blue pill. This is A reality check. This is A mini rebuild situation.

First thing first. See how bad Philadelphia really loves KCP. How about KCP in A sign and trade for that 3rd pick? 76ERS are loaded and could use KCP more then that 3rd pick. I believe the 76ERS would bite.

Next, I would get on the phone with any team and see what I can fish for Reggie Jackson. Orlando, Minnesota, Phx, would all be my focus.

My very next move might be my most important. I would sit down all my scouts and let them know. We can't miss out on A Devin Booker! We can't! We have to make that selection. We can't miss out on that kind of talent.  Go out and get this S.H.I.T. RIGHT!!

Let's check back in to reality. Minnesota, Denver and Philadelphia. Do it like that. Rebuild this S.H.I.T on the fly. Stop lying to self about win now BULL-S.H.I.T Detroit now winning S.H.I.T no time soon.

Get them draft picks right. P.S. Stay away from Donovan Mitchell and Justin Jackson. They will be FLOPS in the NBA. I GUARANTEE IT!!!
You have a timeline problem. S&T can't be worked out till approximately 2 weeks after the draft
avatar
lemonpen

Posts : 930
Join date : 2011-12-27
Location : Southfield, MI

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Nothing's Easy

Post  BallinD on Sat Jun 03, 2017 5:08 am

But I like your ideas, Phil. So we probably can't get much for Weggie right now, but I want him gone too, just might have to showcase him a bit cause I don't think SVG Gores have the stomach for the kind of rebuild cause it is questionable SVG would play a rookie pg. If we could get KCP, a non-star for a 3 pick and it works, I would be surprised.

As for drafting right, I have my doubts if they will swing for the fences. There is probably a star in the making at 12. Kawhi and the Greek Freek are examples of that happening a few picks later. Probably, this year that is true too. The Pistons draft brain trust just passed on going to the jnformal NBA draft Combine 2.0, the same one where the Spurs snagged Jonathon Simmons and are mumbling about trading our no. 12 pick. Hope I'm wrong.

I do like the idea of Justin Jackson or Kennard, maybe Mitchell. So far our draftee workout list is very underwhelming. Pick it up Stan. He obviously likes to eat, but I don't see him having any stomach for even a mini-rebuild. Hope I'm wrong. He seems like the double down type to me, but Mike Valenti gave him the business about our mediocre upside on an interview last week, so maybe he will catch a clue.



Phil1980boy wrote:This organization can be A easy FIX.

I got 3 facts I stand by.

1. Reggie Jackson must go.
2. KCP must be involved in some kind of sign and trade if possible.
3. Let's take the blue pill. This is A reality check. This is A mini rebuild situation.

First thing first. See how bad Philadelphia really loves KCP. How about KCP in A sign and trade for that 3rd pick? 76ERS are loaded and could use KCP more then that 3rd pick. I believe the 76ERS would bite.

Next, I would get on the phone with any team and see what I can fish for Reggie Jackson. Orlando, Minnesota, Phx, would all be my focus.

My very next move might be my most important. I would sit down all my scouts and let them know. We can't miss out on A Devin Booker! We can't! We have to make that selection. We can't miss out on that kind of talent.  Go out and get this S.H.I.T. RIGHT!!

Let's check back in to reality. Minnesota, Denver and Philadelphia. Do it like that. Rebuild this S.H.I.T on the fly. Stop lying to self about win now BULL-S.H.I.T Detroit now winning S.H.I.T no time soon.

Get them draft picks right. P.S. Stay away from Donovan Mitchell and Justin Jackson. They will be FLOPS in the NBA. I GUARANTEE IT!!!
avatar
BallinD

Posts : 371
Join date : 2015-10-29
Location : Milky Way

View user profile

Back to top Go down

The Pistons can be A really easy fix

Post  Phil1980boy on Sat Jun 03, 2017 4:38 am

This organization can be A easy FIX.

I got 3 facts I stand by.

1. Reggie Jackson must go.
2. KCP must be involved in some kind of sign and trade if possible.
3. Let's take the blue pill. This is A reality check. This is A mini rebuild situation.

First thing first. See how bad Philadelphia really loves KCP. How about KCP in A sign and trade for that 3rd pick? 76ERS are loaded and could use KCP more then that 3rd pick. I believe the 76ERS would bite.

Next, I would get on the phone with any team and see what I can fish for Reggie Jackson. Orlando, Minnesota, Phx, would all be my focus.

My very next move might be my most important. I would sit down all my scouts and let them know. We can't miss out on A Devin Booker! We can't! We have to make that selection. We can't miss out on that kind of talent. Go out and get this S.H.I.T. RIGHT!!

Let's check back in to reality. Minnesota, Denver and Philadelphia. Do it like that. Rebuild this S.H.I.T on the fly. Stop lying to self about win now BULL-S.H.I.T Detroit now winning S.H.I.T no time soon.

Get them draft picks right. P.S. Stay away from Donovan Mitchell and Justin Jackson. They will be FLOPS in the NBA. I GUARANTEE IT!!!
avatar
Phil1980boy

Posts : 801
Join date : 2012-01-05

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Getting To There

Post  BallinD on Sat Jun 03, 2017 12:19 am

Whatever we want to see is what we are all arguing about in this offseason of our hopeful discontent.

Do we want to see 2015-16 Stones who surged toward the postseason and competed with the Cavs.  That team looked like it could compete with anybody, so I get the hope.  But I had to admit we did not win one game and maybe the basic azz PnR offense had been sniffed out and would not pass playoff muster.

Or do we want to see a version of the 2016-17 Ish Smith winning streak Stones who showed us a different flavor in a short window by winning without a ball dominant Reggie and doing it in impressive fashion while better utilizing all the talent of the team in a harmonious and exciting fashion.

With SVG is there a middle path?

Need more shooting.


Leuer, SJ, KCP, Morris and Tobias all shot worse than their previous year.  Drummond shot marginally better, but we learned he needs to shoot less than shoot better.  Reggie shot better but can't defend or run a competent offense, he and Drummond were a net negative while on the floor.  Drummond can't play a power game or finish games because of his FT shooting, a mission critical blemish.

What does this really mean?  A mirage or a truth?

So the discussions continue.  Will we draft and try to improve the team, or go for a veteran and trade our pick.  It's hard to imagine our way to contending under either choice, and the way they played down the stetch left a sour taste.  So some are inclined to see more need for change to the core and believe we actually need to create a core, while others believe tweaks, health, and good luck can get us there.

Stirring the Pot of discontent

Deep, impactful draft and big free agent class, lottsa teams wanting to shake things up, while it seems SVG and his annointed hero Big Dre wants to stand pat.  What is Tom Gores thinking?  Does he risk further embarrassment going downtown next year??  Sacramento has three picks, Portland has three, who else could be partners?  Would SVG have patience for rookies? Or must we try to win now?/Win what now????


Last edited by BallinD on Sat Jun 03, 2017 12:25 am; edited 1 time in total (Reason for editing : oops)
avatar
BallinD

Posts : 371
Join date : 2015-10-29
Location : Milky Way

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Trades?

Post  Sparma on Sat Jun 03, 2017 12:10 am

Thanks Oracle.

I like the idea of the Pistons moving up into the top ten, I just think the price will be steep this year to move even into the lower part of the top ten, based on what sounds like the consensus.

The offer would at least be #12 & Stanley Johnson, rather than Michael Gbinije, for the #10. Even then, I doubt that would be a tempting offer to the other team. Maybe Dallas at #9 would go for our 12 & Ellenson? That in turn begins to look to me like two much from our side.

I heard Portland might like to trade one of their three number #1s, if the Knicks took on one of their big salaries. We can't do that for them, but I wonder if Portland might be receptive to trading two of their three 1st round picks (they have 15, 20, 26) for our #12. I'm guessing they'd trade the 20 & 26, but we might not go for that. 15 & 20 would be too much to hope for, I'd think.

[I know those ideas would need to be tweaked to fit NBA regulations.]

btw, 538 (Nate Silver's site) gave the Warriors a 90% chance of winning the series (before it started). They can be wrong, with Hillary sitting on over 70% odds on election night, but that finals pick's looking good.

another btw: if Cleveland loses (badly), I see Carmelo playing there next year (but not for a return anywhere near Love). Hope that happens, for the Knicks and for Carmelo. I must be about the last Phil supporter out there.

Oracle wrote:Two good posts.

First, are you kidding me??? $5000 is all that stands between Ben Gordon and freedom? Come on, he should be able to pick his teeth and have 5K pop out!

Well, if he isn't out by Monday, we need to pass the hat and get our boy out! We didn't help Rodney White when he was flashing his roscoe, so let's help the little runt get out of jail!

Draft Move:
This is very good out of the box thinking, and it would give s way more than I ever imagined we could get out of this draft, even if we had our 2nd round pick.
Sparma wrote:It's my understanding that there's a consensus top ten prospects in this year's draft.  Weird things happen, and I was shocked to get AD at #9 and Ellenson at #18.  Still, I'm skeptical that Michael Gbinije suffices to get us in a position to get Malik Monk.  But there you have it.  Maybe??  No.  We're going to need to try to improve using realistic means.

cbssports:

"Malik Monk, SG, Kentucky


Mock trade: Sacramento sends 10th pick to Detroit for 12th pick and Michael Gbinije.

With perhaps the best natural scorer in this draft still available at 10, the Pistons frantically pull the trigger on a trade that'll instantly give them credibility from three-point land, where this team struggles as much as any team in the league. It's a win-win; the Pistons draft a player in Monk who would have been a top-five level talent in a less stacked draft, while the Kings only drop back a couple of picks and acquire a useful piece in combo guard Michael Gbineje, who was a second-round pick last year (and who shot nearly 40 percent from three his senior season in college)."
avatar
Sparma

Posts : 1010
Join date : 2011-12-17

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: FORUM

Post  cool breeze on Fri Jun 02, 2017 11:05 pm

Oracle wrote:I simply don't understand how you and Don just can't seem to grasp the concept that we don't have any choice except to sign KCP, what about that fact don't you guys get... Wow!

The conversation isn't how much he makes that's so silly it shocks me that you guys keep bringing it up.

If you guys just thought about this for one second, you'd realize(or not) that the more we pay him, the more we get in return if it's a sign and trade or a straight trade.

If your goal is to get rid of KCP, those are your options... there's NOTHING else...

What is it that we don't get Oracle. I am concerned about the team offering Pope a new contract for $20 to $25 million dollars for 4 or 5 years. If that deal is done and Pope doesn't improve next season we will be watching him do the same thing for 5 more years. The team will not be competitive because he will take up too much money. On a sign and trade the Pistons would need to be exceptional smart and guess right on the players we would be getting in return unless the players have short terms left on their contracts. Are you saying that the there is no option for the Pistons to just allow Pope to sign with another team and wish him luck? I just do not see what we would be missing if that happened. Pope has been a key member of an inferior team. He was not the best player on that dysfunctional team on most nights. Harris was the best player in my opinion. I know that I must be missing something though because you seem certain that there are only the two options you mentioned. If the 3rd option is not allowed by the NBA that the Pistons just forget about Pope and plug in another player next year, I didn't know that. If the Pistons can let Pope sign with another team and the Pistons can breath easier because of all that money they didn't have to pay that is the best option in my opinion. Unless Pope is a superstar in the making which I have not seen any sign that he is that type of player or ever has been that type of player, the Pistons need to pass on him. We will find another better 2 guard and groom him. As structured, this Piston roster with Jackson, Drummond and Pope will always be outside looking in and the remaining players will all want to be traded. If I had to pick, I would chose Pope over Drummond and Jackson. However, Pope is not in the top tier of elite 2 guards. The team will be 2nd rate for several years to come so why spend the money? Draft a rookie 2 guard. Play Stanley Johnson and the rookie 2 guard and see where that takes us. Trade Andre Drummond now before he gets any worse if that is a possibility. Draft another center who is more fundamentally sound or take an experienced defensive minded center in the Drummond trade. Keep Jackson and if he improves trade him before the next trade deadline. Detroit is in great financial position for the future. The team will be much more fun to watch. There will be more hope and less depression knowing Drummond, Jackson and Pope will no longer be wearing Piston uniforms. Again Pope never was a leader type player. He never rallied the troops when the team was down in the toilet. He took too many wild off balance shots. His defense was not good enough to make us overlook his offensive defects. However if the Piston owner is placed in handcuffs because he failed to sign Pope because of some NBA regulation I don't know about then and only then should the owner sign Pope of course under protest. It is all about the kind of money Pope is asking for in the end I think. For $8 mil I would want to see how much he can improve. But the risk is too great to get stuck with another high priced player who does impress me at all. However, I respect the fact that you do see something special in Pope. I hope you are right if Detroit does make this big financial decision. But if SVG is not thinking like a short term employee, he has to be really worried about the high possibility that the Pistons will be right back in this same position next summer No money to spend on new players. No trades possible because Jackson, Drummond and Pope will be the same players they were this past season. To me it is extremely important to trade Drummond now because I believe he will play just like Charlie V again next year.

cool breeze

Posts : 2544
Join date : 2011-12-21

View user profile

Back to top Go down

DX

Post  Oracle on Fri Jun 02, 2017 9:50 pm

I simply don't understand how you and Don just can't seem to grasp the concept that we don't have any choice except to sign KCP, what about that fact don't you guys get... Wow!

The conversation isn't how much he makes that's so silly it shocks me that you guys keep bringing it up.

If you guys just thought about this for one second, you'd realize(or not) that the more we pay him, the more we get in return if it's a sign and trade or a straight trade.

If your goal is to get rid of KCP, those are your options... there's NOTHING else...
avatar
Oracle

Posts : 6035
Join date : 2011-12-21

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Sparma

Post  Oracle on Fri Jun 02, 2017 9:45 pm

Two good posts.

First, are you kidding me??? $5000 is all that stands between Ben Gordon and freedom? Come on, he should be able to pick his teeth and have 5K pop out!

Well, if he isn't out by Monday, we need to pass the hat and get our boy out! We didn't help Rodney White when he was flashing his roscoe, so let's help the little runt get out of jail!

Draft Move:
This is very good out of the box thinking, and it would give s way more than I ever imagined we could get out of this draft, even if we had our 2nd round pick.
Sparma wrote:It's my understanding that there's a consensus top ten prospects in this year's draft.  Weird things happen, and I was shocked to get AD at #9 and Ellenson at #18.  Still, I'm skeptical that Michael Gbinije suffices to get us in a position to get Malik Monk.  But there you have it.  Maybe??  No.  We're going to need to try to improve using realistic means.

cbssports:

"Malik Monk, SG, Kentucky


Mock trade: Sacramento sends 10th pick to Detroit for 12th pick and Michael Gbinije.

With perhaps the best natural scorer in this draft still available at 10, the Pistons frantically pull the trigger on a trade that'll instantly give them credibility from three-point land, where this team struggles as much as any team in the league. It's a win-win; the Pistons draft a player in Monk who would have been a top-five level talent in a less stacked draft, while the Kings only drop back a couple of picks and acquire a useful piece in combo guard Michael Gbineje, who was a second-round pick last year (and who shot nearly 40 percent from three his senior season in college)."
avatar
Oracle

Posts : 6035
Join date : 2011-12-21

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Believe It Buddy

Post  deusXango on Fri Jun 02, 2017 9:43 pm

Oracle wrote:Just my opinion, but here are some facts.

The list goes on and on, generally the players with the highest IQ's coming out of school are the less talented players in my experience, because that was their biggest advantage. Magic Johnson? Larry Bird? Isiah Thomas? Grant Hill? Jason Kidd?

I think you guys are very optimistic, Ellenson is going to take awhile to get smart, and this Justin Jackson kid is years away from taking anybody's job, I don't know what you guys are smoking, but it must be some powerful stuff. Can eh even shoot the NBA 3 like the college 3? Just how smart does a NBA PF have to be? Playing behind Reggie Bullock, it may be just a matter of time (that's if SVG does the right thing and signs Bullock over KCP), and my opinion is Jackson will be a much better (consistent) 3 pt. shooter than KCP.

http://www.nba.com/pistons/features/first-round-candidate-justin-jackson-0 wrote:ID CARD: 6-foot-8¼ small forward, North Carolina, junior, 22 years old

DRAFT RANGE: Ranked 13th by DraftExpress.com; 25th by ESPN.com; fourth among shooting guards by NBA.com

SCOUTS LOVE: Jackson broke out as a North Carolina junior after two seasons of deferring to more established players on typically loaded rosters in Chapel Hill. His scoring average jumped to 18.3 after seasons of 10.7 and 12.2 and his shot attempts went from 10.4 as a sophomore to 14.9 as a junior. Jackson also saw a dramatic leap in his 3-point attempts (120 to 284) and accuracy (.292 to .370). That type of shooting range and marksmanship, coupled with Jackson’s unique array of shots on the move and floaters, give him a chance to be a coveted complementary scorer in the NBA. He was a high school contemporary of Justise Winslow in the greater Houston area and ranked the 11th best recruit in the high school class of 2014.

SCOUTS WONDER: Jackson’s frame is the biggest red flag, weighing in at just 201 pounds at the NBA draft combine last month in Chicago. That’s why NBA.com has him listed as a shooting guard on the assumption that he’ll be better suited to defending the slighter players at that spot than bigger small forwards. That could be equally challenging for him, though, and calls into question his lateral quickness and ability to chase around screens. The fact he’s 22 after three years in one of college basketball’s marquee programs and has barely cracked 200 pounds naturally leads to concern over how much additional weight and strength he’ll be able to add.

NUMBER TO NOTE: 2.8 – Jackson’s assists per game, a solid number for a primary scorer who’s not a point guard and indicates Jackson’s vision and passing ability. Put together with his scoring potential, Jackson has a chance – depending on the team that drafts him – to be more ready than most rookies to contribute early.

MONEY QUOTE: “I think it was really important. That’s the feedback I got last year. You’ve got to shoot the ball more consistently to be able to play at this level. I took that extremely serious and last year was kind of just a translation of all the work I put in in the off-season. I’ve tried to keep that going as time has gone on. I’m going to continue to try to do that and continue to try to get better every day.” Jackson at the NBA draft combine on May 11 on the importance of improving his 3-point shooting as a college junior

PISTONS FIT:
 The Pistons are looking to punch up their offense, in particular their 3-point shooting. Rookies rarely come to the league able to shoot at or above the NBA average 3-point mark. The ones who do generally fit Jackson’s profile: players who spent more than a single season in college. His ability to hit floaters and pass make Jackson more than a one-dimensional offensive threat. He’d face a loaded depth chart at small forward (Marcus Morris, Tobias Harris, Stanley Johnson) or shooting guard (Kentavious Caldwell-Pope, Johnson) with the Pistons, perhaps knocking him down a peg or two on their draft board.


BOTTOM LINE:
 Is Jackson a lankier Rip Hamilton or a shorter Austin Daye? Chances are he’ll wind up with a career somewhere in the middle of their far-removed resumes. But if the evaluation of Stan Van Gundy’s scouting staff puts him clearly closer to the Hamilton end of the spectrum, that would represent outstanding value with the 12th pick. Even if the roster argues against Jackson’s fit, he would deserve careful consideration if the Pistons determine his scoring and all-around offensive potential rank near the top of the draft class.
Oracle, after reading the professionals evaluation of Justin Jackson (which I'm grateful that you supplied) it seems that Jackson is the answer to the "how much do we pay for a middling, skilled SG in KCP" dilemma. We're coming off a 37-45 season, for whatever reason, with the 3rd highest payroll in the NBA and the torches and pitch forks are out to run off our starting center (a max. contract player) and our starting PG (who makes damn near max. money, based on when he signed his contract), so let me appeal to the businessman in you. Just how many games did KCP put the team on his back and carry them to victory (the occasional wild-eyed 3 is not putting a team on his back when he went 3-22 from the field; it's called luck). How many NCAA champions are on the roster? How many colligate "All Any Things" are on the roster? How much has KCP improved since he left Georgia?! Enough to deserve a max. from the Pistons? This is not about loyalty, this is business. Nothing changes if nothing changes; this team needs to start developing for the future. It's plain madness to talk about winning now, while we collectively roll over and acknowledge the Cavs and Warriors will rule the roost for the next 3-5 years. Our job now should be getting on top of the Celtics, the Wizards, and the hard-charging Buck's. Starting now with the likes of Harris, Ellenson, Johnson, J. Jackson, and yes, Drummond, we should be ready to compete for a 'ship in the next 3-5 years, and the money saved by not making foolish signings, we can sign that superstar that'll make a difference.
avatar
deusXango

Posts : 2739
Join date : 2011-12-21
Location : Oaxaca, Mexico

View user profile

Back to top Go down

To dream the impossible dream....

Post  Sparma on Fri Jun 02, 2017 9:03 pm

It's my understanding that there's a consensus top ten prospects in this year's draft. Weird things happen, and I was shocked to get AD at #9 and Ellenson at #18. Still, I'm skeptical that Michael Gbinije suffices to get us in a position to get Malik Monk. But there you have it. Maybe?? No. We're going to need to try to improve using realistic means.

cbssports:

"Malik Monk, SG, Kentucky


Mock trade: Sacramento sends 10th pick to Detroit for 12th pick and Michael Gbinije.

With perhaps the best natural scorer in this draft still available at 10, the Pistons frantically pull the trigger on a trade that'll instantly give them credibility from three-point land, where this team struggles as much as any team in the league. It's a win-win; the Pistons draft a player in Monk who would have been a top-five level talent in a less stacked draft, while the Kings only drop back a couple of picks and acquire a useful piece in combo guard Michael Gbineje, who was a second-round pick last year (and who shot nearly 40 percent from three his senior season in college)."
avatar
Sparma

Posts : 1010
Join date : 2011-12-17

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Ben Gordon

Post  Sparma on Fri Jun 02, 2017 8:53 pm

"Former NBA player Ben Gordon was arrested Thursday morning, according to online jail records.

Gordon, 34, was taken into custody by Los Angeles police at 7:10 a.m. local time and he remained in jail with his bail set at $5,000 as of Thursday afternoon. TMZ reported that Los Angeles police and firefighters responded to Gordon's apartment complex after he allegedly pulled several fire alarms.

An LAPD spokesperson told USA TODAY Sports details were not yet available on the arrest."
avatar
Sparma

Posts : 1010
Join date : 2011-12-17

View user profile

Back to top Go down

I don't believe it, but that's...

Post  Oracle on Fri Jun 02, 2017 6:13 pm

Just my opinion, but here are some facts.

I have rarely seen even superstar players have high BBall IQ's in their rookie contracts.

Examples that I have followed.
1. Kobe - Dumb as nails, Laker fans were terrified when he had the ball, wondering if they were going to see something great or something dumb.
2. Shaq - Took years to become passable IQ wise, and some think he never got quite right.
3. DWade - took his teams out of games just as fast as he got them into games.

The list goes on and on, generally the players with the highest IQ's coming out of school are the less talented players in my experience, because that was their biggest advantage.

I think you guys are very optimistic, Ellenson is going to take awhile to get smart, and this Justin Jackson kid is years away from taking anybody's job, I don't know what you guys are smoking, but it must be some powerful stuff. Can eh even shoot the NBA 3 like the college 3?

http://www.nba.com/pistons/features/first-round-candidate-justin-jackson-0 wrote:ID CARD: 6-foot-8¼ small forward, North Carolina, junior, 22 years old

DRAFT RANGE: Ranked 13th by DraftExpress.com; 25th by ESPN.com; fourth among shooting guards by NBA.com

SCOUTS LOVE: Jackson broke out as a North Carolina junior after two seasons of deferring to more established players on typically loaded rosters in Chapel Hill. His scoring average jumped to 18.3 after seasons of 10.7 and 12.2 and his shot attempts went from 10.4 as a sophomore to 14.9 as a junior. Jackson also saw a dramatic leap in his 3-point attempts (120 to 284) and accuracy (.292 to .370). That type of shooting range and marksmanship, coupled with Jackson’s unique array of shots on the move and floaters, give him a chance to be a coveted complementary scorer in the NBA. He was a high school contemporary of Justise Winslow in the greater Houston area and ranked the 11th best recruit in the high school class of 2014.

SCOUTS WONDER: Jackson’s frame is the biggest red flag, weighing in at just 201 pounds at the NBA draft combine last month in Chicago. That’s why NBA.com has him listed as a shooting guard on the assumption that he’ll be better suited to defending the slighter players at that spot than bigger small forwards. That could be equally challenging for him, though, and calls into question his lateral quickness and ability to chase around screens. The fact he’s 22 after three years in one of college basketball’s marquee programs and has barely cracked 200 pounds naturally leads to concern over how much additional weight and strength he’ll be able to add.

NUMBER TO NOTE: 2.8 – Jackson’s assists per game, a solid number for a primary scorer who’s not a point guard and indicates Jackson’s vision and passing ability. Put together with his scoring potential, Jackson has a chance – depending on the team that drafts him – to be more ready than most rookies to contribute early.

MONEY QUOTE: “I think it was really important. That’s the feedback I got last year. You’ve got to shoot the ball more consistently to be able to play at this level. I took that extremely serious and last year was kind of just a translation of all the work I put in in the off-season. I’ve tried to keep that going as time has gone on. I’m going to continue to try to do that and continue to try to get better every day.” Jackson at the NBA draft combine on May 11 on the importance of improving his 3-point shooting as a college junior

PISTONS FIT:
 The Pistons are looking to punch up their offense, in particular their 3-point shooting. Rookies rarely come to the league able to shoot at or above the NBA average 3-point mark. The ones who do generally fit Jackson’s profile: players who spent more than a single season in college. His ability to hit floaters and pass make Jackson more than a one-dimensional offensive threat. He’d face a loaded depth chart at small forward (Marcus Morris, Tobias Harris, Stanley Johnson) or shooting guard (Kentavious Caldwell-Pope, Johnson) with the Pistons, perhaps knocking him down a peg or two on their draft board.


BOTTOM LINE:
 Is Jackson a lankier Rip Hamilton or a shorter Austin Daye? Chances are he’ll wind up with a career somewhere in the middle of their far-removed resumes. But if the evaluation of Stan Van Gundy’s scouting staff puts him clearly closer to the Hamilton end of the spectrum, that would represent outstanding value with the 12th pick. Even if the roster argues against Jackson’s fit, he would deserve careful consideration if the Pistons determine his scoring and all-around offensive potential rank near the top of the draft class.
avatar
Oracle

Posts : 6035
Join date : 2011-12-21

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: FORUM

Post  cool breeze on Fri Jun 02, 2017 4:52 pm

Oracle wrote:Drafting the right guy, having him come in and move somebody out.

Think Curry getting knocked out of the starting lineup by Prince.

Competition is good, and that goes for any position we have, if somebody can beat out KCP or anybody else, they should get the job.

That's going to be Ellenson's task, he shouldn't get it on day one, he should have to earn it.

Oracle dX just provided more information on Jackson and I too believe he is the right player and the steal of this draft. However, if he is drafted by Detroit and SVG signs Pope all bets are off relating to anyone playing more than 10 minutes a game. How many minutes did Reggie Jackson or Andre Drummond really earn this past season? If Pope signs SVG is going to play him regardless of what happens. I wish that SVG believed in true competition regardless of the contract but he doesn't.

Draft Justin Jackson. Trade Drummond and attempt a sign a trade deal with Pope. Otherwise let Pope walk. The Pistons will be much better if those three things happen.

How about that game by Durant? WOW!

cool breeze

Posts : 2544
Join date : 2011-12-21

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: FORUM

Post  Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Page 9 of 13 Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13  Next

View previous topic View next topic Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum